Did you know that the Allentown Mayor and Council are exempt from following any city travel rules just because they are elected? They do not need to follow the ethics laws, the PA State rules, or the Public Purpose Doctrine that is a constitutional rule that limits how government — including municipalities — may spend public money.
Ethics, conflicts of interest, and financial disclosure laws are state level laws, and they state that the Mayor and Council are not above the rules of the municipality, and they are not able to be exempted from the State ethics laws.
One of the interesting items that were uncovered from the Human Resources Committee meeting tonight was that our mayor seems to have violated the State Ethics laws may times by accepting travel from vendors who the city has contracts with. Hmmm?
Frank Kane let that one drop when he said that there is no need to report travel paid by a vendor or outside agency. Are these people for real? I thought I would help you.
They are so inept that they don’t even know they are exposing their own corruption. The PA State Ethics Act states the following:
What Travel Is Not Allowed?
Travel paid by vendors, developers, contractors, or regulated entities
● If the city regulates them, contracts with them, or they seek approval from the city, officials cannot accept travel from them.
Travel paid by lobbyists or principals
● Lobbyists and principals are categorically prohibited from providing travel benefits.
Travel that creates a conflict of interest
● Any travel that could reasonably be seen as influencing official action violates §1103(a) and §1103(b).
The mayor has accepted travel from contractors. As an example, the city has routinely partnered with Bloomberg and Harvard, and they have paid the mayor’s travel – a clear violation of the ethics laws. #PhiladelphiaFBI
So tonight your clueless council accepted the ruling of the city's solicitors that the mayor is exempt from the rules, yet they were unable to cite where that exemption is coming from, other than a 2001 memo from a prior Solicitor. That tells me that no investigation was carried out, and the clueless legal department once again took the easy path and protected their mayor. The legal department is embarrassing enough but the council accepting that they aren’t able to do anything is worse. The Mayor is not above any of the rules of the city, the code, manuals, policies, etc. The council controls what policies (i.e. the PPM and financial policies) become law.
The council needs to stop believing the bullshit that this administration is presenting them and start working for the people of this city. Then again, Mota was the sponsor of this bill tonight, and she didn’t even show up. It is a slap in the face time and time again with these people.
Lastly, why is Mario the HR Director answering a policy that is clearly another Bina Patel area? Is it because Bina never has answers, so they put the HR Director up there? Well, he didn’t seem to know anything and babbled on about nothing related to the issue.
He probably should not speak again.


.jpg)

















(1).gif)

.jpg)



.jpg)




.jpg)


















.jpg)
.jpg)







.gif)
.jpg)










