The City Council completed a financial impact study with Maher Duessel on the fiscal health of the city. This study included the impacts of enacting a DROP program, something that Matt Tuerk didn’t complete before blindly signing the DROP agreement. The study concluded the city would be obligated to roughly between $1.1 million to $2.8 million in its first year, and up to $3.5 million annually after five years, depending on how many officers opt in to the program. $1.1 million to $2.8 million initially and then $3.5 million a year forever. For-eeever!! The report also indicated that by 2030 the DROP implementation would be a serious contributor to significant depletion of the reserve funds.
FOP President Matthews tried to persuade city council by first saying with the DROP, APD would lose so much knowledge and wouldn’t be able to provide all the necessary functions of safety for the citizens. He painted a doomsday scenario where it was proclaimed "30-40" officers will be leaving. I find it very interesting that there is a repeat of no succession planning in the city, at all levels, and the problem is now at the feet of the taxpayers to solve with more taxes. When council showed concern about the administration’s current level of spending tax dollars and paused large expenses to have an independent study, FOP Matthews thought it would be a good idea to become ignorant towards council. Remember that he told Council President Napoli ,“you can go tell the all the guy's families who are trying to plan their lives that you aren’t going to pass this”?
The financial study was released last Wednesday, and it showed what I mentioned above. DROP = no good for the city. Chief Roca said at a council meeting that there are 15 officers looking to retire. Wow, that’s way down from 30-40, Matthews stated. Then Roca talks about how he has reduced his budgeted staff from 230 down to 210. Hold up. So, you’re saying you can work with less officers? Then it comes out the new police station isn’t going to be built, but instead the city will renovate the old one. After they spent millions if not all the $9 million in ARPA relief funds on blueprints and computer renderings among other bullshit they have NOTHING to show for. How do you explain the wasting of all that money Chief? Please explain what happened to it.
Chief Roca then says how the city shouldn’t keep kicking the can down the street and just build the Trump Tower police station. He then begs for the DROP program. Surely because he wants it for himself. $20 says he retires soon once this doesn’t happen. But. And there’s a big fucking butt. He says he committed to being financially responsible to the taxpayers! Yo! Robocop, do you listen to yourself? You want a DROP that minutes earlier was proven it will bankrupt the city. You want a shiny police station named after you. Bankrupt the city twice. And you blew millions on designing a station and have nothing but a projected photo. Oh, maybe a couple of white and orange spray painted lines? Each line probably costs a million each. 😆
Now for the finale of this DROP pension parade. How did this DROP get talked about more than any other issue? No other issue has received this much of a focus. This has been a topic at least 5 times at a council meeting this year. Does any other topic get this much attention or podium time?
The FOP decides to sue or what I can see threatens to sue the city council if they don’t approve the DROP. Citing the mayor has the power to implement any contract without Council review or concurrence. News flash, first off if this was the case. Why did you go in front of the council and beg for them to pass it? Why is the Chief trying to negotiate contract benefits to council at a public meeting? Not your job or place too. Lastly, as shown by the agreement, the FOP and the city or mayor signed clearly states the agreement would need to be approved by the city council.
How can it be possible that the mayor can decide alone the terms of a binding contract when his role is administrative and the Council has control of the funding? Allentown specifically operates under the Home Rule Charter, the answer turns on what the Charter, Administrative Code, and labor-relations provisions say regarding collective bargaining agreements and contract approval. If the FOP or any other Union can have a nervous breakdown and fail to hear the concerns of the governing body, resulting in a temper tantrum with threats and screaming, then why have a mayor or council? It seems to me like the true rulers of Allentown are the unions. They seem to think they decide how the city authorizes and commits tax dollars.
The real issue isn't whether police officers deserve fair compensation. They certainly do. The real issue is whether Allentown can afford another long-term financial obligation when independent analysts are warning about reserve depletion and future budget pressures. City Council asked for a financial study before committing taxpayers to millions in additional costs. That's called due diligence. If the DROP program is truly as beneficial and affordable as it is being claimed, then APD leadership and the FOP should welcome scrutiny, not threaten lawsuits when questions are asked. In a city already struggling with spending priorities, vacant boards, deferred projects, and financial uncertainty, “trust us” is not a fiscal policy.
Apparently in Allentown, asking how to pay for something is now considered an act of aggression.















































.gif)

