I reviewed the $134 million bond that is being discussed at the city council meeting tonight and it totally slipped my mind. There isnt even $50 to help the homeless in its proposal. This clearly shows the mayor does not give two shits about them.
I am not for building homeless people new homes or letting them live in my front yard, but as a human being I think we should do the decent thing and help each other atleast a little.
I mean, if you are going to ask to pass $134million bond, and the homeless issue is a big issue, why didn't the mayor ask for atleast a couple hundred thousand to work on that problem? But he can allocate $4,750,000 to build a bridge at Canal Park!!!
Does this Mayor solely care about his business ties and his future in politics? I supported Tuerk in May despite my obvious concerns I post about, but Zucal is definitely looking to secure my vote with these antics.
I will be posting surveys now for fun. Note it takes like 3 seconds until the question pops up. Just be patient. Ill take suggestions on surveys to post.
4 comments:
Whats going on here? This whole Bill is messed up. I cant wait to watch how the city justifies this. Unbelievable.
This city is circling the drain... and it's ALL BY DESIGN and DESIRED. Do a deep dive into how people act and what is being done about it... NOTHING!!! As far as this scribe is concerned, it's all for redevelopment.
How's the redevelopment in our once great downtown going??? Such a joke.
How's the city care for the innocent indigent oneZ when they live in hovelZ that are uninhabitable blight under the care of HUD!)$? Locally itZ legal for the itZ to collect HUD for there tenants that are employees as well as friends employees!)$? I will tell you how itZ a itZ retired senator that getZ the eZpass by local HUD inspectorZ!)$? The fact that itZ a REpublican going up to the third level of hell for the hole of pa!)$? Also the inhabitants are ten to 15 deep in home ment for a maXimum of four or five
Newsflash... how do you think the properties get in the condition they're in??? THE INHABITANTS!!! They destroy and move on to the next place to destroy. My question is how do they not get turned down for the next dwelling based on the destruction they caused at their last abode?????? These are the people that probably belong in tents.
Post a Comment